Daniel Evans vs Jan Jermar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How critical is second serve performance when it comes to predicting a winner? Over the recent six months, Evans has excelled by capturing 46.26% of points on his second serve, while Jermar lags behind with 40.34%. This statistic, renowned for its correlation with match outcomes, suggests Evans holds a slight edge. But does this translate across other areas of the game?

Evans and Jermar show a closely contested battle in return game performance. In recent form, Evans has managed to snag 45.63% of his opponent's second serve points, with Jermar slightly edging him out at 46.64%. Interestingly, for first serve returns, Jermar again takes the lead ever so slightly with 30.17% compared to Evans at 29.07%. These percentages provide insights into who may be favored in head-to-head matchups.

When the pressure is on, how do these players fare? Jermar appears more resilient, saving 54.17% of breakpoints, compared to Evans at 52.71%. This resilience under pressure is a crucial tipping point for live betting enthusiasts. But what about overall success rates? Jermar boasts a better match-winning percentage over the past year at 52.27%, while Evans sits at 43.48%. This overview hints at a slight overall advantage for Jermar in terms of consistency.

Let us turn our attention to surface preferences. Evans seems to thrive on indoor hard courts, displaying a win rate of 62%, whereas clay courts don't seem to be his forte at 46%. Meanwhile, Jermar enjoys the hard courts best, triumphing 49% of the time, but similarly struggles on clay with a 40% win rate. This nuance in surface preference could play a pivotal role depending on the tournament setting. The tour level they play at also matters; Evans has frequented Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 50% success rate, while Jermar navigates mainly at the Futures/Satellites level, holding firm with a slightly better 52.27% win rate.

Average opponent ranking also speaks volumes about competitive experience. Evans has consistently faced players with an average rank of 177.09, while Jermar tackles slightly lower-ranked competition at 201.43. If the match extends to a deciding set, Evans shows greater prowess by winning 44% of such sets, against Jermar's 36% success rate. This stat could be a dealbreaker for bettors eyeing close matches.

Ultimately, who is favored to win? The numbers suggest a balanced duel. However, assessing breakpoint conversion provides an extra layer of depth—Evans, proficient in converting 38.04% of breakpoints compared to Jermar's 29.41%, sharpens his edge when opportunities arise in pressured moments. Based purely on the stats, Evans's ability to capitalize on such chances and his familiarity against tougher opponents might just secure him a win in this matchup. But as always in sports, surprises await at every corner!